- Side loading large refuse containers and no contradiction
The pressure to streamline the management of waste and recyclable material removal has included the use of advanced vehicle technology such as side tippers. Recent studies show that successful large refuse container systems (MGB) with the use of side tiping vehicles for the high mechanical stress were not yet grown. The MBF system would like to set a new standard.
(10.09.07) based in several years of research on practical tests for the analysis of the kinematics of rear and side loaders beds as well as finite element analysis in ever-optimized simulation models showed that cause modifications to the existing MGB system is not sufficiently reliable and durable products . The solution to all problems, therefore, required a completely newly developed container system.
Of the Sulo Environmental Technology in cooperation with the vehicle manufacturer Faun MFB-developed system, consisting of the circular lifting for side-loading vehicles and the multi-function container, is now to all requirements. The containers are approved for use with side tipper vehicles. In addition to the specially adapted to the circular lifting the MFB MFB is also compatible with all commonly used lifting devices. That is also good if you have side tipper contracts in mineral ores.
Since April 2005, about 17,000 MFB, 240 tested in the district of Fulda for their practical application. The containers must be emptied trip planning with rear and side loader vehicles. In the side tippers come here both the new circular lifting and clip attachment (Grabber) is used. The MFB is proving so far as perfectly compatible with all of the used vehicle and bed types. Even when used with conventional rear loader vehicles are determined by the shape of the container time advantages. Since the content will not form can not and freezes in winter, no need to repeat "vibrate" the bed. In addition to saving time, making it a lesser bed wear and longer service life is expected of the container. As a major cost advantage is a proven failure rate of less than one percent of Preserves Heritage status, the industry average, three to five percent.
In addition to field test the INFA was commissioned to undertake scientific comparison test. The essential aim of the investigation here was to check the recording speed of the new container system under standardized conditions in comparison to conventional systems (rear and side loader, MGB 240 and DU 240). In addition, an economic analysis was conducted for the scenarios.
The investigations have shown that the MFB can shorten the name to the circle segment receiving the discharge process by up to 20 percent. As a result, in practice, a cost savings of up to 10 percent. In addition to the absorption rate was also within the scope of this study re-examined the compatibility of the MFB with other lifter. The MFB is both circular segment, Grab-and comb inclusion of a side loader and for the lifting comb suitable rear loader.
Today's requirements for a container system requires flexibility in operation, guaranteed side-loading capability, stability and high efficiency. These requirements are by no more than 30 years in operation in the MGB system - to achieve - or at least not completely. wish for treatment facilities that take advantage of side tippers already, or do so in the future, is the MFB system is an economical alternative dar.
